En los últimos 15 días, China ha mostrado un comportamiento que tiene perplejo a medio mundo. La cumbre celebrada en Alaska entre altos representantes de política exterior de China y Estados Unidos, que debía marcar el tono de la relación entre ambos países durante la presidencia de Joe Biden, no podría haber ido mucho peor. Yang Jiechi, jefe de política exterior del Partido Comunista de China, acusó a Estados Unidos de tener una “mentalidad de guerra fría”, de “incitar a algunos países a atacar a China” y de utilizar su poder militar y financiero para “aplastar” a otras naciones. Los estadounidenses, dijo, han perdido la confianza en la democracia, en parte por un racismo generalizado y la manera en que su país trata a las minorías. A diferencia de Estados Unidos, dijo, China no cree “en las invasiones, ni en utilizar la fuerza para derribar otros regímenes… o para masacrar a gente en otros países”.

That kind of confrontation is not usual in the diplomatic field, Yang acknowledged.Less normal was still that this speech was made in the presence of journalists, who did not just believe what they were seeing.

But it wasn't just that.Days later, a much lower figure, the Chinese consul in Rio de Janeiro, Li Yang, attacked the Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, on Twitter: “Chico, your greatest achievement is having ruined the friendly relationships between China and Canada and having convertedCanada in a US skirt dog.What a waste! ".Even the 'Global Times', a medium in English of the Communist Party of China, wondered if "a diplomat must speak like this".

The attacks on the West followed. Después de que la marca de ropa sueca H&M decidiera dejar de comprar algodón de Xinjiang por la posible implicación en su elaboración de uigures condenados a trabajos forzados, un líder de la región afirmó que se trataba de “la mayor acusación falsa de la historia de la humanidad” y que la empresa no tenía derecho a ganar dinero en el mercado chino. A esas declaraciones les siguió un boicot a H&M promovido por los medios y el propio Gobierno, tanto en las aplicaciones de comercio electrónico como en las tiendas físicas.Then, China applied sanctions to several European politicians and diplomats after they accused the country of violating human rights."The EU must stop giving lessons to others about human rights and interfering with internal affairs," said its Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Some information even indicated that the Chinese government is stopping the invasion of Taiwan as a mere hypothesis: “It seems that China...It is more impatient and more willing to test the limits and consider the idea of unification, ”said a high American position to 'Financial Times'.

Bad Credit Auto Loan Refinance - How to Refinance An Auto Loan http: // t.CO/SHPDMETT

— Aylin Fri Jun 22 05:30:12 +0000 2012

Of course, this did not happen in a vacuum.The American Foreign Secretary has talked about the "genocide" of the Uigures.The EU has imposed sanctions on China for the first time since the Tiananmén slaughter in 1989.Australia has thoroughly investigated Chinese responsibility in the propagation of COVID-19.The West has not only made its confrontation with China more explicit, but has done so in a coordinated way: the United States, Canada, Australia and the EU begin to have a joint strategy.

China has the right to defend itself.No one hopes not to do so, even when the West is right to accuse her of violating human rights and when she was increasing.The perplexity for the speed and aggressiveness with which China is deliberate.

It makes economic sense that, in its last five -year plan, presented in March, the Communist Party has drawn a “self -sufficiency” strategy, a progressive reduction in its dependence on exports and investment of foreign companies, before a “hostile external environment”.But does the country have enough muscle to make that difficult process of transformation as fast as its aggressive diplomacy wants to convey?After what happened these days, it is possible that the commercial agreement he signed with the EU at the end of last year - which for Europeans meant to be able to operate comfortably in the immense Chinese market, and for China, the possibility of breaking the unitEU action with the United States - not even enters into force.Can you really afford it?

Beyond rational calculations, it seems that China is entering a usual drift between countries that feel with strength to occupy a hegemonic place in the world and dispute that primacy with others: arrogance.And the story is full of failures due to an excess of it: from the Soviet Union in the seventies to the Germany of Guillermo II during the first and a half decade of the twentieth century, of the Spain of the restoration at the end of the 19th century toFrance after World War II with Algeria.

China's economic growth in recent decades is not preceded.The regime is not threatened or has a minimally viable opposition.The world has no choice but to consider China a great power.But, at the same time, his haste.China has proven to have a deficit of knowledge about the functioning of Western democracies, which has prevented them from seriously influencing them and being attractive beyond its brute force.Maybe one day I get it.Meanwhile, it seems condemned to confuse its legitimate objectives with nationalist reveries to impose itself on the West.